Hi, On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:01:21PM +0100, João Pais wrote: > The offset of [tabread4~] was there to avoid any reading errors when the > index points get too high (the whole sample is almost 7m long). So > there's not option for this, but to use only the right entry?
I believe it should be possible to correct the timing issues of the offset inlet with some additional calculations involving [timer] and [bang~] that take into account that this inlet is only updated at block boundaries. It's probably a bit tricky to get right, but I suppose it could work. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
