Could you direct us to the fix? .hc
On Mar 16, 2012, at 7:15 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: > FWIW this has been fixed in L2Ork but only for the newly created arrays. > Opening old patches requires resizing them as they are saved incorrectly in > the patch. > > Best wishes, > > Ico > > Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A > Composition, Music Technology > Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio > Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra > Assistant Director, CCTAD > Virginia Tech > Department of Music > Blacksburg, VA 24061-0240 > (540) 231-6139 > (540) 231-5034 (fax) > disis.music.vt.edu > l2ork.music.vt.edu > ico.bukvic.net > > Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: katja <katjavet...@gmail.com> > > To: pd-list@iem.at > > Cc: > > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 6:35 PM > > Subject: Re: [PD] Array resize : bug? > > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Pierre Massat <pimas...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> Hi Katja, > >> > >> I confirm this behaviour in windows too. So I understand that the actual > >> number of samples is the same, the only difference being that they all fit > >> within the GOP frame when resized by a message, whereas the last sample is > >> out of the frame when the size is set upon creation. > >> > >> Should I report a bug? Or is there a reason to this? > > > > Oops, seems I responded off-list by accident. > > > > The initial situation with > the last sample outside the frame is > > annoying, I guess this could be reported as a bug. > > In 0.43.1-extended-20120201 at least, it is definitely a bug. When you > create an > array with, say 10 elements, the last one extends 20 pixels outside of the > gop box! > > -Jonathan > > > > >> > >> 2012/3/16 katja <katjavet...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>> Hello Pierre, > >>> > >>> With Pd-extended 0.42.5 for OSX it's similar to your description. > >>> However, when resizing to a low size like 10, and manually counting > >>> the number of 'sliders', it can be verified that the correct > > number of > >>> points is visually represented. > >>> > >>> Katja > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Pierre Massat > > <pimas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > Dear list, > >>> > > >>> > I've just noticed a strange behaviour of arrays in Pd-extended > > 0.42.5 > >>> > running in Win XP. > >>> > When I manually create an array and set it's size through its > > properties > >>> > (right-click, etc.), say, to 44100 samples, the range on the X > > axis is 0 > >>> > to > >>> > 44099. Fine. > >>> > Now when I resize it by sending it a message ("array1 resize > > 44100"), > >>> > the X > >>> > axis now spans from 0 to 44100 (that is 44101 samples). > >>> > > >>> > Anybody noticed this in other versions/platforms? > >>> > > >>> > Cheers, > >>> > > >>> > Pierre. > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > >>> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > >>> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >>> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "A cellphone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you are." - Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list