On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote: > > The main reason why this is still like this is because no one has written > better code, then done thorough testing in order to prove that the new code > doesn't break anything. People have written better code for this before, no > one has done the thorough testing part...
Hans, can you point to such code, is there still something available somewhere? I may be able to test it using the testtools templates. Such code could be a very useful precision improvement, even though it's not the same as double precision. Katja _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
