hi *!
first of all, thanks for all your helpful replies to my earlier question
about messages and abstraction - i'm still trying to understand some of
the comments, but i'm going with claude's suggestion for now to keep the
ID knowledge outside of all related objects and not use $0. so far, that
seems to do the job, and the code is a lot cleaner now. will post asap.
quick question: is it legal to (ab)use creation parameters to inlets and
outlets for documentation, or does that lead to unwanted side effects?
i'd like to do something like this:
[inlet Set level in dB]
[inlet Set Fader position in mm]
[outlet Current level in dB]
[outlet Current Fader position in mm]
[outlet~ Gain coefficient]
of course i could use comments, but i don't like the way they don't
line-wrap in a controlled way, plus their association to what they are
annotating is a bit weak for my taste...
best,
jörn
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487
Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
Tonmeister VDT
http://stackingdwarves.net
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
