>________________________________
> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic <[email protected]>
>To: Funs Seelen <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]
>Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 1:29 AM
>Subject: Re: [PD] is there a way to send a bang precisely when a sample is
>looped using tabread4~?
>
>On 07/15/2012 07:43 PM, Funs Seelen wrote:
>> You don't need information from [tabread4~ ], but from [phasor~] to do that.
>> The value of phasor~ increases except for one moment, the moment your new
>> loop starts. So check while comparing each current sample [n] to the one
>> before [n-1] for the moment [n] < [n-1]. You can do that with [expr~
>> if($v1<$v2, 1, 0)] and do for example the following:
>>
>> [expr~ if($v1<$v2, 1, 0)]
>> |
>> [env~]
>> |
>> [== 0]
>> |
>> [change]
>> |
>> [sel 0]
>> |
>> [bng]
>>
>> Connect [phasor~] to the left inlet of [expr~].
>> Connect [phasor~] also to [biquad~ 0 0 0 1 0] or if you have zexy to [z~]
>> and connect its outlet to the right inlet of [expr~].
>>
>> There might be other possibilities but this should work.
>>
>This is still limited to the signal vector size inside pd even at the smallest
>env~ buffer (which is also incredibly CPU intensive). In other words, pd by
>default does everything in 64-byte chunks (unless one manually alters this
>behaviour which with lower buffers results in a rapid increase in CPU
>overhead).
You mean like [block~ 1]?
-Jonathan
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
