On 19.8.2012, at 12:15 , Pierre Massat wrote: > OK, it all makes sense, I just thought some list members might get tired of > reading 100 messages about the RPi. But yes, it might just as well go back to > normal in a few days (though in my case I seriously doubt it :) ).
in fact this can and does happen with any topic! For instance, I think I'll not have an application for libPD for the time being, but I wouldn't say 'never'. This happens everywhere and the traffic here is not particularly high, so far. ;-) YMMV of course. > 2012/8/19 <[email protected]> > > Quoting Michael Zacherl <[email protected]>: > > Although I'm subscribed to all Pd-lists I almost missed some interesting > discussion on Pd-OT (hey Ed! ). > I just had a look only because you mentioned that. > Just out of an impulse I'd like to suggest to close this OT-list and simply > follow the netiquette of proper tagging. > another 2c, Michael. ;-) > > i was thinking of simply redirecting all mails for pd-ot to "pd-list" with an > added "[ot]" prefix. > but then it didn't seem to be so important and i ended up doing more fun > things. > > fgmasdr > IOhannes -- nonconform? noiseconform: http://blauwurf.at http://soundcloud.com/noiseconformist _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
