Hi, Andy and how does your system work? Do you have a link? How many speakers are you using?
I dont need high degree of phase stability , i need to control 50 very cheap speakers. I dont really mind if they dont produce all the frequency range. If each speaker generate only one frequency , its ok. I only need to be able to control them (the 50) from the computer, i was thinking, maybe not using sound? cheers U. 2012/9/2 Andy Farnell <[email protected]> > > A question to consider; Do the channels need a high degree > of phase stability? > > Fernando is designing for a WFS system here. You may have more > relaxed requirements for a theatre or installation multichannel > system not needing such a degree of correlation. > Using a very simliar approach with jack-udp, but with > asynchronous receivers, chained ethernet, using gumstick > or Raspberry Pi boards with cheap audio USB dongles. > > Andy > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: > > Best solution I've seen so far is by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano -- there's a > > paper in the Linux Audio Conference 2012: > > http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2012/papers/29.pdf > > > > cheers > > miller > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:58:50PM +0200, umberto torrez wrote: > > > Hi list, i was wondering which is the best approach for controlling a > lots > > > of speakers with pd? 50 ? > > > Is there any hardware or technique that allows to do this and that is > not > > > so expensive? > > > > > > any idea? > > > > > > Umberto. > > > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
