> > 
> > The [table] object could be vastly extended: [table foo] would be equivalent
> > to [tab define foo] and you could say for instance, 
> > [tab define foo -struct my-struct -save -range 0 100]
> 
> If you're not requiring the user to name the array "z" and requiring
> "z" to have a float field "y" then you would need
> 
> [tab define foo -struct my-struct -array z -y y]
> 
> where "-y" defines which field to use as the independent variable
> in the table (similar to "-y" in [plot]).
> 
I'm thinking in the above that foo would be an array of items of my-structs,
not a struct with an array such as 'z' inside it.

Another way of invoking tab would allow you to attach a name temporarily
or permanently to an array within a struct (provided via a pointer message).
Then indeed you'd need the field name such as 'z'.

cheers
M

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to