>________________________________ >From: Patrice Colet <colet.patr...@free.fr> >To: pd-list <pd-list@iem.at> >Cc: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at> >Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 10:41 AM >Subject: Re: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: >getting sample rate of file loaded into an array) > > >> De: "IOhannes m zmölnig" <zmoel...@iem.at> >> On 10/04/2012 05:04 PM, Patrice Colet wrote: >> > >> > We should use C language only when we need it, in the example of >> > [waveinfo] vs [soundfile_info], both aren't the good way for me, >> > we just need the [binfile] external for reading the header, and all >> > the other stuff can be done into a pd patch. >> > >> >> we don't need [binfile]! >> > >how do you read the header without binfile?
I don't know a way without externals. Anyway, I think you're being trolled. -Jonathan > >> Pd is proven to be turing complete, so it should be easy enough to >> write >> an operating system entirely in Pd (that is: a patch) that will allow >> you to read/write soundfiles in any desired format. > > >pd is not even able to read extended precision, that's why pd can't tell about >aiff samplerate. > > >_______________________________________________ >Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list