i used unicode fonts only
if i remember well

a big font exists (cant remember the name)
with almost all existing codes implemented





2012/10/7 J Oliver <[email protected]>:
> Indeed pd 0.42-5. One of my old versions.
>
> thanks!
>
> J
>
> ***************
> Jaime Oliver
> www.jaimeoliver.pe
> [email protected]
> Columbia University
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 7, 2012, at 3:57 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>
>> On 10/07/2012 06:51 AM, J Oliver wrote:
>>> that's a bit weirder and might well be a bug in Gem.
>>>> please send a patch that exhibits this problem.
>>>
>>> Attached
>>>
>>
>>
>> your patch is encoded in some ISO-8859 encoding, while Gem expects a
>> UTF-8 encoded string with the "text" message.
>>
>> this most likely hints, that you are using an older version of Pd
>> (<0.43). one of the biggest things about Pd-0.43 is probably it's full
>> UTF-8 support, which should fix all these problems.
>>
>> i converted your patch file to UTF-8, and now it works ok:
>> $ iconv -f ISO-8859-15 -t UTF-8 accents.pd > accents-UTF8.pd
>>
>> as another check, i switched my keyboard layout to hebrew and entered
>> the text via a symbolbox and it displayed just fine (though it got the
>> font-direction wrong; but it's probably best to leave bidirectional text
>> handling out of Gem's scope and move that to a separate external).
>>
>> for those tests i was using the stock debian packages (puredata-0.43.2-4
>> & gem-0.93.3-5)
>>
>>
>> fgmadr
>> IOhannes
>> <accents.pd>_______________________________________________
>> [email protected] mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to