I don't quite follow, but if you think there are bugs in the windowing objects, you should file a bug report.
.hc On 10/16/2012 05:03 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > seem to have nailed the gaussian window, but with different width values > than the object. > > 2012/10/16 Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]> > >> Hi there, I was studying the window functions for FFT, so I was trying to >> build into vanilla pacthes the window functions that come on Pd-Extended >> [windowing] package. I got to do them all, but kaiser~ and gaussian~ >> >> Do any of you feel capable to perform this ver nerdy taks? >> >> Well, anyway, here are some inconsistencies/mistakes I found ont the >> description of the formulas that are present in the help of those external >> objetcts: >> >> - blackman~ instead of 0.8 it should be 0.08 >> >> - welch formula: 1-abs(x) - not sure, but doesn't seem to be right or >> clear. I used this one: http://paulbourke.net/miscellaneous/windows/ >> >> - barlett~: 1-x^2 doesn't seem to be right or clear either, I used this >> one: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ApodizationFunction.html >> >> - connes~: cos(pi*x/2) - it's the same as cosine~ so it can't be right, I >> used the above link again. >> >> Cheers >> Alex >> >> >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
