----- Original Message -----
> From: Cyrille Henry <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 1:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] firm delay scheduling
>
> hello,
>
> if your problem is detecting when cpu is over 100% so that delay is not
> acurate,
> then the best solution is some kind of external watchdog.
>
> just send a message every 10 ms to an other software, if this external
> software
> did not receive anything during the last 20ms, then there is a cpu problem on
> the pd side...
>
>
> the external software can be an other pd, a shell script (using pdreceive, or
> anything else.
How is the second pd going to complete its computations on time when the CPU
is over 100%?
>
> cheers
> c
>
> Le 30/10/2012 18:13, Jean-Marie Adrien a écrit :
>> Hello
>> I'm trying to launch security procedures in case of trouble, that will
> respond in less than 250 msec.
>> The fundamental question is :
>>
>> Is there an object to schedule an event in the future with firm absolute
> delay ?
>>
>> {realtime} measures time AFTER the problem (no scheduling)
>> {del} schedules things but the delay is kind of elastic, depending on the
> CPU load.
>>
>> thanks
>> JM
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> [email protected] mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
