I can see the potential problems. I have however pointed out in the site in the next bullet immediately below the download links "Precompiled for Ubuntu (may also work on other distributions)." I guess I really need to move to the deb model of distribution... On Nov 9, 2012 12:13 PM, "András Murányi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Ico, I completely understood what you meant by compiling from > source. I just wanted to point out that there is no notice with the > download link nor a check during "make install" so the "best option for > newcomers" binary can eventually screw up someone's installation, and that > someone may or may not have the time/skills/heart to compile the thing from > source. It's not 100% safe. > Me, I'll compile it as soon as I have some time. > > András > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Ivica Bukvic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, those are binaries you tried installing. The script included in the >> full package simply copies files, it does not do any dependency checks. >> What you need to do is to compile from source... >> On Nov 9, 2012 11:57 AM, "András Murányi" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> (Ouch) OK :) >>> I don't know what's possible during a "make install" but ideally it >>> would check for the presence of the right glibc in order not to install >>> something that won't work. >>> >>> András >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older >>>> version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package. >>>> Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much >>>> automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also >>>> listed on the page). >>>> >>>> If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Apologies for x-posting... >>>>>> >>>>>> It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate >>>>>> of >>>>>> pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely >>>>>> sporadic >>>>>> bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first >>>>>> "beta" >>>>>> release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The >>>>>> latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now >>>>>> includes >>>>>> over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as >>>>>> both >>>>>> 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit >>>>>> http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid >>>>> and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error: >>>>> pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by >>>>> pd-l2ork) >>>>> pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by >>>>> pd-l2ork) >>>>> >>>>> András >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
