you are right - those numbers seem to be to good to be true. On the other hand I followed the instructions in the latency patch and don't know what could have been wrong.
Am 26.11.2012 um 19:04 schrieb Miller Puckette <[email protected]>: > Hmm - I'm getting latencies between 6 and 7 (Fedora 17, Core 7200, INTEL > "HDA", latest Pd from git, but I think Pd 0.43 should do similar). > > cheers > Miller > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Max wrote: >> Am 26.11.2012 um 16:18 schrieb J Oliver <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi Max, >>> >>> Is it possible for you to test this same card in linux? >>> >>> J >> >> I wanted to do this, but I don't have a linux machine with firewire, so i >> can't test the ffado driver for the card. I wanted to try out the class >> compliant mode, but there is a bug in ALSA which prevents it to work. see >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg28935.html >> I didn't wanted to get started recompiling the kernel for this. sorry. So in >> theory it should work, but only if you remove the bug in the ALSA part. >> >> for the record i compared the on board intel card of the linux machine, the >> result is quite impressive, i don't think it can get any better: >> >> /doc/7.stuff/tools/latency.pd >> Sampling rate 44100 Hz, delay 20 ms Blocksize 64 >> Ubuntu 12.04 Intel® Core™ i3 CPU 550 @ 3.20GHz × 4 >> Latency HDA Intel (hardware) >> >> print: 21.9012 >> print: 21.9037 >> print: 21.9063 >> print: 21.9088 >> print: 21.9114 >> print: 21.914 >> print: 21.9165 >> print: 21.9191 >> print: 21.9217 >> print: 21.8834 >> print: 21.886 >> print: 21.8885 >> print: 21.891 >> print: 21.8936 >> print: 21.8961 >> print: 21.8986 >> print: 21.9012 >> print: 21.9037 >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
