----- Original Message -----
> From: Simon Wise <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 7:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] [nbuntil]: an non-blocking [until] replacement
>
> On 17/12/12 08:06, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>> Why not just trigger each iteration with [bang~]?
>
> because with [bang~] you would get a single iteration per block, rather than
> as
> many iterations as you have time for ... which seems to be the intention of
> [nbuntil], and very useful where you might want to do a loop which may be too
> long for one cycle but you can wait and use the results when they are ready,
> after a few cycles perhaps.
Ah I see. So it assumes iterations won't take a majority of a dsp tick.
-Jonathan
>
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
