I could be wrong, but I believe the Beagleboard is ARMv7 and the Pi is ARM v6 - so BB could easily have twice the floating-point erformance of Pi. I'm not sure why and whether there would be any difference in Jack for the two. I believe (but am not sure at all) that BB doesn't have the same USB problems the Pi has. All in all it's still a very attractive possibliity, perticularly since the Stanford people have tested and exercised it thoroughly.
cheers Miller On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:38:40PM +0100, Pierre Massat wrote: > Dear List, > > I came accross this "Stompbox design workshop" ( > https://ccrma.stanford.edu/wiki/Stompbox_2011). They use Pd on a > beagleboard to make stompboxes. > They talk about the older version of the beagleboard with a CPU running at > around 700 MHz. This is the same speed as the RPi's. > > I'm wondering what kind of latency they achieved on the beagleboard. > Leaving aside the problem of the lack of audio in, don't you think we > should be able to get the same performance on a raspberry pi ? > Also, I wonder why JACK runs on the beagleboard and not on the RPi. > > Cheers, > > Pierre. > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
