Anyway, I replaced [pix_mix] with a couple of [spigot]s inside a subpatch and it works fine. Still, I think [pix_mix] would be more correct, so to say, since I'm using Gem..
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis <[email protected]>wrote: > I know that, I make sure that the pixes do have the same dimentions. > Otherwise I would get an error, right? Also, the left inlet receives signal > (if it doesn't it [pix_mix] won't output anything, I'm aware of that too). > Could anything else be the problem? > > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:18 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 12/30/2012 11:26, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: >> >>> Is it possible if you have a few [pix_mix] objects that one or two of >>> them are not working? I have a patch with four instances of the object >>> and one of them is not working at all. It just lets the left inlet pass >>> through. I tried them with and without arguments and it's all the same. >>> Is there some problem with having a few instances or am I doing >>> something wrong? >>> >>> >> all pix-objects that take 2 pixes (including [pix_mix]), require that the >> two pixes are of the same dimension and colorspace. >> maybe that's the problem. >> >> fgmadsr >> IOhannes >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** >> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list> >> > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
