You have a receive sharing the same name as in the example patch.
It's in [pd rect-length] and it's [r G].
Not a very specific name... :)


On 08/01/2013 19:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
No, that's not the case. I've actually never really touched the example patch. Anyway, my actual worry is why these objects behave the way they do in my patch, which is really strange. In order to see what's wrong I opened earlier versions of the patch I'm working on (which were using [link] and [mass] fine) and they also show the same strange behavior. It looks like a bug hit it all of a sudden.. I've attached an earlier version which is smaller, if anyone's willing to check. Physical modelling is inside [pd object1], [pd object2] etc. inside [pd coordinates1].. It used to be that the first time you hit the bangs, the rectangles wouldn't behave as expected (in the gem window), but after that everything was working pretty stably. Hope someone can help.


On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:08 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at <mailto:zmoel...@iem.at>> wrote:

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    On 2013-01-08 19:02, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
    > Just an addition to this, there's some more weird behavior. When I
    > have my patch open, with no bangs sent to [link] or [mass], if I
    > open the 01_basic.pd patch from pmpd's examples, I get "error:
    > inlet: expected 'float' but got 'bang'", whereas if I open
    > 01_basics.pd without having my patch open, everything seems to work
    > fine. I'm not using [send] from [metro] to [link] and [mass], but I
    > rather connect them with cords. I'm just sending this one as well
    > in case it's a hint that will help someone who might know what's
    > wrong.

    wild guess: you have copied (and modified) the example patch and
    re-used some of the receiver labels (the first arg to [link]/[mass]),
    but are now sending other messages to those labels that are not
    understood by the objects in 01_basics.pd

    fgmasdr
    IOhannes
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
    Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

    iEYEARECAAYFAlDsYJ4ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTfuQCg9xakByo1gGTQJFKsR/vErL59
    MbEAoMw7mm1n5Ph1UWB1nkMxvs2HWFWh
    =UmEb
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    _______________________________________________
    Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list
    UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
    http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

--


~    Pierre-Olivier Boulant     ~
-o-     www.puffskydd.net     -o-
~   www.flickr.com/pob31/sets   ~
-o-    www.lepixophone.net    -o-
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to