So would it be an updated FUDI or an all new protocol?
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:15 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]>wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2013-01-21 23:35, Martin Peach wrote: > > Wouldn't it be a good idea to settle on a graphics metalanguage > > rather than translating tcl code to qt or whatever? > > > that's exactly my point: creating a FUDI-style communication from > pd->gui, which can easily be parsed by any GUI-client you wish to use. > > something like: > > obj <id> <x> <y> <name> <args> > which will correctly render an object (whether it has rounded corners > or shadows) > > fafjrt > IOhannes > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlD+SrEACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQP9QCgpNNq45sjxb86iEI6JC8N8e3d > LQUAn3N9jbI98/e5OOeGIxz+OkE9DaMj > =qQRF > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
