> De: "Roman Haefeli" <[email protected]> > Envoyé: Mardi 22 Janvier 2013 23:24:09 > > On Die, 2013-01-22 at 22:20 +0100, Patrice Colet wrote: > > > De: "Patrick Pagano" <[email protected]> > > > > > I am very interested in finding a non-external way to constantly > > > loop > > > sound files of ANY size. > > > > > > > using two [readsf~] is working so far so good for looping large > > soundfiles, with the offset option and a signal crossfading between > > them. > > Why using an offset? Why not letting each of them play the file to > the > end?
Offset would be used for looping a part of the soundfile only, it's not simple indeed because we need to know the file length too, but's it's usefull for looping files writen in real time with [writesf~] for example, in this case the offset is used for reading the sound that comes after the end of the loop for mixing it with the begining of the loop, and then it can prevent to cut some sound's releases, or reverb. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
