Forgot to copy the list.... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Ivica Bukvic" <i...@vt.edu> Date: Feb 6, 2013 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ? To: "Charles Goyard" <c...@fsck.fr> Cc:
On Feb 6, 2013 3:07 PM, "Charles Goyard" <c...@fsck.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > On 2013-02-06 14:20, Charles Goyard wrote: > > > I guess it's more a bug of Gem install script rather than pd-l2ork, > > > but I just wanted to point that out. > > Gem's "install script" (aka Makefile) installs everything, including > > all compiled backends. > > what makes you say that there is a bug here? > > You're right. I tried from crash with Gem alone and everything is ok: > make clean > git pull > aclocal > ./autogen.sh > # ^-- btw this two commands are missing from the readme.txt > ./configure --with-pd=/opt/pd-vanilla-0.43/ --prefix=/opt/gem 2 questions: 1. Why are you compiling gem separately when pd-l2ork compiles it for you and includes it with its binary package? 2. Why are you trying to use pd-vanilla includes with pd-l2ork (unless you are using pd instead of pd-l2ork)? The two are not compatible and as I indicated on the site with a huge warning box mixing the two will cause crashes and unexpected behavior. > make > sudo make install > > When all goes smooth on first time, everything is ok. > However, it seems that if something fails during compilation and you > rerun make, then the .so files are not copied if they were produced by > the former run of make. It already occured to me when building > pd-extended a few months back. It can be a dependency problem in the > various targets, a bug in make, something wrong with my system, a > personal problem with my cat... Whatever the cause, I get a source > directory with everything: sources, gem.pd_linux and *.so, and an install > directory with everything but the *.so files (yes, the gem.pd_linux gets > copied). > > I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature, so apologizes for using the > wrong word. Maybe it's worth writing in the README.txt what a make clean > can be necessary on some cases. > > > Ivica Bukvic wrote: > > How did you install pd-l2ork? > > From source with archlinux's PKGBUILD, with cwiid missing. So I first > ran a build, which failed, and then fixed the problem, rerun the build > and got into the problems described above. > > > > Again, I need as much information as possible about how you installed the > > software. > > Well, I'll say the problem comes from make/fix/make. Obviously it's not > that important at all. There is/was the same kind of problem in > pd-extended with ln -s other existing symlimks that forces you to clean > and rebuild everything (I reported that on sf) after hours of > compilation just because a symlink exists. Annoying ain't it ? > > Thank you all for your being patient :), and of course for your great > software ! > > -- > Charles > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list