That's what I was assuming. How to build just pdp.pd_linux minus the pdp_opengl.pd_linux is the question
I'll try later this afternoon if I get the chance M On Feb 17, 2013, at 12:35 AM, Simon Wise <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17/02/13 01:25, me.grimm wrote: >>> Has anyone tried using pdp on a Pi? >> >> i get: >> >> ../../include/pdp_matrix.h:25:27: fatal error: gsl/gsl_block.h: No >> such file or directory >> >> even when doing: >> >> ./configure --disable-glx --disable-gsl >> >> which gives me: >> >> --enable-mmx=no >> --enable-quicktime=yes >> --enable-v4l=yes >> --enable-pwc=auto >> --enable-sdl=yes >> --enable-x=yes >> --enable-xv=yes >> --enable-glx=no >> --enable-gsl=no >> --enable-png=yes >> --enable-debug=no >> >> >> ??? > > that looks like pdp_matrix is using shaders and therefore won't work on the > Pi ... probably need to avoid building it, plus any other parts that are > using shaders .... more clues on this below, bit it seems from a glance at > google that OpenGL was an addition to pdp, but a while ago ... so there may > be quite a lot that does not depend on it. > > I have two binaries in the /usr/lib/pd/extra/ ... pdp.pd_linux and > pdp-opengl.pd_linux ... while in /usr/lib/pd-extended/extra/ I have just > pdp/pdp.pd_linux, so they were obviously built quite differently. > > The one in extended came with a pd-extended deb, and presumably from the > pd-extended build system, while the pdp-opengl.pd_linux came with the pd-pdp > deb so maybe its worth building from the debian source package, but avoid > building the opengl part???? > > Neither of these packages are very recent, but both work. > > > Simon _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
