-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-25 17:17, Charles Goyard wrote: > Hi, > > Cyrille Henry wrote: >> >> looking at the thread, i was assuming that the question was >> about shmem, but it look more like a question about >> pix_share_write. > > Yes, it was, but since I failed to find the code of shmem (now I > found it on svn), I assumed it was the same thing as pix_share_* > (and then forgot about the general purpose of shmem). Sorry for the > confusion. > > Anyway, since I want to share video frames, pix_share sounds good. > > Now as IOhannes points out, v4l2loopback is certainly more > standard, and probably fast enough. So maybe I'll start with this > and explore the other way round if I get a bottleneck. I can output > to v4l with pix_record and the v4l2 backend, that's right ?
pix_record has backends for output to both v4l2 and v4l (aka: v4l1) fgamndsr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlErpCAACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQgIwCfRkdBA4/70geIHTLHyd6Wgork hmYAnR7RGdyIeUAUMWnW59nTdkGzIEQI =tbdq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
