>________________________________ > From: katja <[email protected]> >To: Jonathan Wilkes <[email protected]> >Cc: Phil Stone <[email protected]>; pd-list <[email protected]> >Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 5:24 AM >Subject: Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency > > > > > > > > >On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Jonathan Wilkes <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> >>Btw-- are you sending compressed or uncompressed audio? >> >> >> > > >Uncompressed, 16 bit ints. Compression requires analysis, introducing extra >latency. I'm not using it in practice yet, as I still have to find (or >develop) a solution for packet loss concealment.
You might check out Opus. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opus_%28audio_format%29 -Jonathan > > >As of now, I use a cheap work-around for wireless monitoring only: an FM >'stereo' transmitter and receiver. FM stereo does not send over two frequency >channels, therefore audio quality is suboptimal, not suitable for regular PA >situations. However it may be suitable for 'silent concert' experiments in >small venues. > >Onyx, is that an idea? Most cell phones do have an FM receiver. They only work >with wired headset connected, functioning as antenna. As wired headsets can be >cheap, just offer them for sale during the event. The good thing with FM is, >it has zero latency. I got a LinexFM transmitter from here: > >http://www.linexfm.nl/ > >Rumors go that USA versions have higher transmission power than the ones sold >in Europe. > > > >Katja > > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
