Hey Dan, It sounds like it could have been an abstraction to handle some functionality of the app way back in the early days i.e. recording. It's definitely legacy code.
To be honest, some parts of the rjlib aren't really that necessary any more. For me most useful part of rjlib is all the dsp and list processing abstractions. At some point we even ditched the soundinput/output abstractions and used adc~/dac~ instead. In more recent apps a lot of functionality was moved to the objective-c side, which allowed the pd side to focus on what it does best, making cool sounds :) Cheers, Joe On 10 June 2013 18:40, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > Howdy, > > Does anyone who worked on/with the original RjDj app know what the [rjdj] > abstraction does/did? I see it in playback.pd in the rjlib Github repo. Is > it just a wrapper for a send? Like: > > [inlet] > | > [s rjdj] > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- Follow me on Twitter @diplojocus
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
