I don't think it is incomplete freeing of patch resources based on what I saw so far. Could it be the watchdog's ping, isn't each of these tied to a specific timestamp? On Jun 19, 2013 3:50 AM, "Roman Haefeli" <reduz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 22:58 +0200, András Murányi wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > > > I've got used to putting my PC to sleep (aka hibernation) often > > lately. Now there is this behaviour of Pd that when you leave a patch > > open and put the computer to sleep, once it wakes up Pd will try to do > > everything it missed while the computer was sleeping, so the CPU goes > > 100% for quite a while. I suppose this is by design. > > > > What I've just noticed using l2ork is that I had closed my patch > > before hibernating (in order to avoid the CPU boost when waking up), > > put the computer to sleep for a few hours, and when i woke it up, > > surprisingly the 100% CPU boost still happened - with only the main > > window and console open. > > > > This makes me think some things are not destroyed properly when a > > patch is closed. > > > > Any thoughts appreciated... > > Does it help to toggle DSP off and on, when Pd is in this post-suspend > mode? I had the impression it did, but I wasn't sure if it was just a > coincident, that CPU usage stopped at the same moment. > > Roman > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list