On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:08 PM, András Murányi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 22:58 +0200, András Murányi wrote: >> > Hi List, >> > >> > >> > I've got used to putting my PC to sleep (aka hibernation) often >> > lately. Now there is this behaviour of Pd that when you leave a patch >> > open and put the computer to sleep, once it wakes up Pd will try to do >> > everything it missed while the computer was sleeping, so the CPU goes >> > 100% for quite a while. I suppose this is by design. >> > >> > What I've just noticed using l2ork is that I had closed my patch >> > before hibernating (in order to avoid the CPU boost when waking up), >> > put the computer to sleep for a few hours, and when i woke it up, >> > surprisingly the 100% CPU boost still happened - with only the main >> > window and console open. >> > >> > This makes me think some things are not destroyed properly when a >> > patch is closed. >> > >> > Any thoughts appreciated... >> > > I've tested it out a bit, and IOhannes and Ivica are right: it's a cleanup > problem, rather something else. (It happens also when there is and there > was no patch open). > i mean NOT a cleanup problem > > >> >> Does it help to toggle DSP off and on, when Pd is in this post-suspend >> mode? I had the impression it did, but I wasn't sure if it was just a >> coincident, that CPU usage stopped at the same moment. >> >> Roman >> > > Yes! I was actually toggling DSP on and off, because I usually keep it > off. When I switched it on, CPU usage instantly dropped to normal. > Seems like a symptom that is avoidable... > > > András > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
