Hah ok, that's what I figured but didn't try. After writing patch file parsing 
for PdParty, I agree that they are not "human readable". It would be nice if 
there was a short list as you say for the most obvious options.

On Aug 7, 2013, at 6:00 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> From: IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PD] gui object arguments
> Date: August 7, 2013 2:42:33 AM EDT
> To: [email protected]
> 
> 
> On 08/07/13 07:49, Dan Wilcox wrote:
>> Do any of the pd gui / iem gui objects take creation args? Forgive me if
>> I missed this in the help patches.
> 
> all of them do, as this is the way how they keep their properties when
> loading a patch.
> 
> on the downside, most of these arguments are not really meant for humans
> to parse/write.
> and afair, they don't support "short lists" of arguments (so you have to
> specify all arguments, or a rather longish subset)
> 
> 
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com





_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to