hi, a somewhat related question: I'm trying to do something like this: [routeOSC /*/ID] but that doesn't seem to work Is it at all possible to use wildcards with routeOSC? help patch only mentions "[set /*( this will match any OSC message"... thanks, Tim
2013/8/8 IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2013-08-07 15:12, Colet Patrice wrote: > > Le 07/08/2013 08:15, [email protected] a écrit : > >> hi all, > >> > >> i have more than 50 OSC messages to [routeOSC], i would like to > >> avoid having to cut and paste & click and drag. what are my > >> options here? > >> > >> [routeOSC /knob1 /knob2 ...] | | [s $0-knob1] [s > >> $0-knob2] > >> > >> thanks > > > > someting like this, and no need for routeOSC > > > > [dumpOSC]-[set $1 $2, bang(--[ ( > > [dumpOSC]? > is this zombi still around? > > > > > [r /knob1] > > > > this is basically the same as roman's solution, but imho both miss > some points: > > - - by switching from [routeOSC] to you lose pattern matching. > the OSC-message `/knob* 0` should set *all* knobs > > - - you are giving up localization. where's the $0 gone to? > > - - you assume a fixed format of the knob message, namely that it has > exactly one argument. > > > something like this should be better: > > [routOSC /knobs] > | > [t a a] > | | > | [symbol] > | | > | [pack s $0] > | | > | [symbol $2-$1( > | | > [list split 1] | > | | > [send ] > > > which still doesn't give you pattern matching. > > > i once did a send-based solution with pattern matching which was quite > complicated. > it would include a address-registration, where each [receive] would > register it's name, e.g. "/foo/knob1/value", using a wrapper > abstraction around [r]. > all these labels were filled into a central pattern-matching object > (zexy's [matchbox] was made for this). > the output of [unpackOSC] would be split into the address and the > arguments, the address gets expanded by [matchbox] to all possible > targets and the data is sent to those targets using a dynamic send. > > [routeOSC] should be faster though, as it can operate on a more local > level. (thus having to compare against less possibilities). > > > mfgasdr > IOhannes > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlIDZjAACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQSvACdEqlHGVTxK8yFAhT7GyeOEac0 > ZC0AoOsXXaSqu3/DqB5zioQqmLwNBwMA > =O3d2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
