Hi Tony - I'm not sure, but I always thought you can distribute LGPL objects within commercial (closed-source) software. If I'm wrong about that, the next step would be to re-rwite the patch without using expr~ and not include expr~ in the product. (I keep it as an extern to make that easy to do.)
cheers Miller On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:32:21AM -0600, Tony Hillerson wrote: > Hey guys, > > I'm wondering about the restrictions for using Pure Data patches in Android > and iOS apps with libpd. I have a rudimentary understanding that if I > distribute software that's released under the GPL or LGPL I need to make > available my source or at least the object files of my app. > > As I understand it, from the vanilla distribution contains [expr~], which is > LGPL. If I use libpd, I'm distributing it, and I need to make the source or > the object files of my apps available. Is that correct? Are there any paid > apps that use pd and distribute through Google Play or Appstore? > > -- > Tony Hillerson > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
