Hah I know but I imagine there could be a way to "fallback" to the original implementations. My reaction was based mostly on how nice they look. That seems to be important to some people and I've had to push them in workshops to not dismiss Pd purely because it "doesn't look like Max" (go figure ...).
On Dec 31, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Pierre Guillot <[email protected]> wrote: > The Vanilla objects have the advantage to work fine on computers with very > few memory and old graphic cards or on the hardwares like the raspberry pi. > My objects don't need the best computer but I think if I use a very old > computer I'll have some latency. > But thank you ! And for Pd-extented, I'm going to explain the architecture of > the code on the git (that's not difficult) if this can help you to help me. > > Cheers > > > 2013/12/31 Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> > Some of us can help with that :D > > On Dec 31, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Pierre Guillot <[email protected]> wrote: > >> - I didn't schedule to add the library to pd extented because it's already a >> lot of work and I'm ashamed but I'm not very familiar with the Makefile... >> And the default one seems complicated to use when you have more than one >> file per object. But if someone want to help me, he's welcome ! > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > > > > > -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
