On 2014-01-09 10:59, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > Well, I've been posting on the jack mailing list too, and some people > there mention that Pd is known to have a poor Jack support...
afaict, Pd's jack-support is still suboptimal when it comes to
automatically starting jackd; it also has a weird channel numbering
scheme (jack applications usually start counting their channels with 1)
and the client naming scheme is imho bad as well ("pure_data_0" with no
way to change that).
however, i cannot see any wrongs with jack support apart from that: once
jack is running and you manage to connect Pd to whatever other ports,
everything works very stable.
f
gasrdm
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
