-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-01-21 22:35, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > On 01/21/2014 04:02 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >> On 01/20/2014 10:01 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: >>> It might help some if the selector inside a message box were >>> visually distinct from the rest of the message. >> +1 >> >>> You could also have different colors for built-ins vs. custom >>> selectors. >> -1 > > Hm... care to explain your votes? Is it the word "colors" that got > a "-1", or the idea of visually distinguishing between the two > groups? >
the latter. how the selector differs from the atoms should be a matter of user-definable preferences. and i'd like to have a way to distinguish atoms (with potential whitespace characters) from the whitespace atom-separator. fgamsdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJS34aeAAoJELZQGcR/ejb4TO0P/0Y3xEjCf9z8XZtlwGc99vgp 58fXtG5jKEEIdmVcHonhQwFpXAza7B+3Zb+jAe30MazZ5s3GldT7MPnoCGTkCgL+ 8j4tZwoSVAzcwMC1eE+383F7yhu1hLj4jddWk0V7SQj/NH6848MG/dqzUnHQWEpJ 52cfDK1yg5B4d1WLlCYUaA3JE1oXwGasVkmW4wIMn+u1+Y05JJDq4x7UuTt3oE12 6nPrgQ/WPes8kWM4vO0+Yd4Kg80gLqSI0+ZxMVp6X/cj4jsQejsj5coq8AG0vxNe l3zEdDXqAwHR+v6MbGy/IJhm9rs+pq55Eye5NMY/l9DByNODK+aJN/WouMhTJRQN H5WumjsGl0dzqIXHb73bTbO82f5EpL36gXL3GNSmHe8rfYd6/6Ff1kHOdKM8rEt7 a1MSyMtblchntflviwdHUe1JQF5tuQqT1JapDZipBIfPd5cYGAHGVtBVK7hMMM7F Rc1fZNNjG7RrFaXW3Ks5I0sdvbCTniyK28AaGoqAGflXRgfZOJombqfSGu11iE4H mk3VnQOe9hDvZ88e9p60VQ1VVkgbTd2SYRcyzrInipfTprbtzJ5hruSh4xLPaDyF 0QOZ6qoe/lH+t5mh9VHu3YspOUej6QQVc/enhpf3dnizPrY7hkl+AxaCKsf4fnBQ JBf/NQpy0TSc27nhB4Um =BzNs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
