Howdy Miller, Sorry to bring this up again. The license in the expr source code headers has been updated to LGPL, but I just noticed the post in vexp_if.c line 386 still reads:
"expr, expr~, fexpr~ version %s under GNU General Public License ". On Oct 5, 2013, at 8:53 PM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > Awesome, thank you. I'm glad we could figure it out. I remember checking a > few times and we discussed this in libpd. I kept getting confused by the > different licenses. > > On Oct 6, 2013, at 3:55 AM, Miller Puckette <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OK... done and pushed to git repo. >> >> cheers >> M >> >> On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 12:18:23PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: >>> Hmm... Looking back in the git repo i saw: >>> >>> commit 42f3e5f8dbc60ad644e9f8a1c5b61d1847e19470 >>> Author: Miller Puckette <[email protected]> >>> Date: Thu Nov 3 11:40:35 2011 -0700 >>> >>> change expr~ source to LGPL license (with IRCAM"s permission :) >>> >>> I had quite forgotten about this (and still can't remember this ever having >>> happened) >>> but here's the e-mail I got from Shahrokh: >>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 02:50:53AM -0700, Shahrokh Yadegari wrote: >>>>> Dear Max and Miller, >>>>> >>>>> I got news from IRCAM that they are willing to release expr code on LGPL. >>>>> Will that solve the current licensing problems? >>>>> >>>>> Max, could you communicate to the list and let me know what they think >>>> about >>>>> this. I hope this helps. >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> Shahrokh >>> >>> So I think we're in the clear (although I hope Shahrokh kept the mail from >>> IRCAM authorizing this!) >>> >>> I'll go on and change the source over here so that it appears in the git >>> repo. >>> (This will take some time as I first want to merge my 0.45 fixes into >>> 'master'.) >>> >>> cheers >>> Miller >>> -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
