Wow, thanks! You've fundamentally changed my understanding of [trigger]. I didn't realize it actually waited for the operation to complete before sending the next event.
Works great now, thanks again. -martin On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Jack <j...@rybn.org> wrote: > Hello Martin, > > It should be quite simple with a [trigger] to get a bang when > [folder_list] and [pix_buffer] have finished their job. > To simplify : > > [t b b b] > | | | > | | [folder_list] > | | > | [pix_buffer] > | > final bang > > ++ > > Jack > > > > Le 05/03/2014 22:59, Martin Eckart a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I'm loading a series of images into a pix_buffer using folder_list and > [open( messages. I would then like to send a bang event once all the > images are loaded. > > 1) Is there a way to find out when pix_buffer has finished loading an > image? Maybe pix_buffer_write has something? > 2) Is there a way to know when folder_list has finished outputting all the > files? > > This seemingly easy problem has me scratching my head. The best > workaround I can think of at the moment is to just build in a long enough > delay before triggering the finished event but that feels like a dirty > hack. > > Thoughts? > > -martin > > > _______________________________________________pd-l...@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
