(I believe this might rather belong to pd-list instead of pd-dev) On Don, 2014-03-06 at 18:56 -0500, me.grimm wrote: > Roman, > > >> wrapping points. The only drawback compared to [phasor~] is that > the > >> latter allows to control the frequency with a signal and the > >> [metro]/[vline~] based phasor obviously doesn't.
> I never did quite figure it out but how do you do more advanced things > with [vline~] such as updating/increasing ramp speed mid ramp? Frankly, I often find myself struggling with those kinds of problems. > >> I'll be glad to help you build the [phasor~] replacement that has > an > >> additional bang outlet, if you need it. > > Are you saying this is possible with just metro/vline~ combo? I would > be curious what that looks like if you did build it.... It wasn't as easy as I initially expected it to be. I already had a [metro]-like abstraction that can do intra-interval tempo changes. However, I figured it was buggy (it worked only for the first tempo change within an interval) and had to redo it. That was the most difficult part. Combining it with [vline~ ] to make a [vphasor~ ] with extra bangs at each wrapping point wasn't as hard (at least not with its current limitations). Check attachment. Roman
vphasor~.tar.gz
Description: application/compressed-tar
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
