Ok folks, never mind, I did some more testing with sigmund~ and I do now see
that minpower and growth seems to be working. It works in a way I'm not quite
sure to understand so I find it hard to use those parameters in a meaningful,
predictable way, but I guess that's because of my limited understanding of
what's going on exactly under the hood.
Benoît Fortier
Le mercredi 12 mars 2014 16h50, Benoît Fortier <benoitfort...@yahoo.ca> a écrit
:
Thanks for your reply. Yes I did some testing with fiddle and Helmholtz, If I
need to I'll get to that in an other question.
My question wasn't clear enough sorry about that. I would like first to clarify
some aspect of the sigmund "notes" mode which seems very straight forward in
the help file, namely growth and minpower parameter, but which in practice I
find it doesn't quite work as expected. As anyone ever managed to get
significantly different output by changing those two parameters? Are they
working at all, and if so can anyone explain for the record how they actually
work? Or maybe I'm missing something obvious?
I'll ask a clearer question regarding other specific strategies for refining
pitch tracking result soon, thank you for your help.
Benoît Fortier
581 995-5622
Le mercredi 12 mars 2014 16h02, Alexandros Drymonitis <adr...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
Haven't tried [sigmund~], but [fiddle~] and [helmholtz~] (the latter by Katja
Vetter) and I found [both fine but [helmholtz~] a bit better for my taste. I
think it's a bit more responsive. What if you combine this with [env~] for
example and this way you get pitch and amplitude...
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Benoît Fortier <benoitfort...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
Dear list,
>
>
>I've been working on a patch for quite a few months now which involves pitch
>tracking. I've explored many possible solutions, considering the pros and cons
>of every approach, made different tests, etc. I've also done a lot of reading
>(help files, forums, etc), but I couldn't find satisfying answers to all my
>questions. I am now in front of 4 or 5 different approach, each of which
>requires to do a certain number of compromise at different level. My feeling
>is that I am now at the point where I could possibly eliminate some of those
>compromise with your help.
>
>
>I have a lot of questions, but I'll start with one regarding Sigmund's notes
>parameters. I've done a lot of tests, changing one parameter at a time. I
>found that only the stable time and vibrato parameters seems to be affecting
>the output the way it should. The other parameters - growth and minpower -
>doesn't seem to be working the way it's described in the help file. Am I the
>only person who noticed that? When I looked in the list archives, I found
>someone else mentioning this issue but nobody replied (and i lost the link to
>the thread).
>
>
>I'm using my patch to track the pitch of a violin. What I'm trying to do is to
>convert the pitch of the violon into the most accurate "note on" message
>possible (with midi note and velocity). I need this patch to be as responsive
>as possible but also with as few insignificant output as possible.
>
>
>Thanks for your help!
>
>
>Benoît Fortier
>581 995-5622
>_______________________________________________
>Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
