Hi Miller, On 22/08/14 23:08, Miller Puckette wrote: > I think I'd want to disambiguate everything in one mechanism - perhaps > interspersing the message itself with the information (putting the > count in ahead of the address, and also putting symbols 'f', 'i', 's' and > 'b' in front of the items). But I'm thinking it's wisest to wait and see > what people need in real usage - if, indeed, anyone ever wants such > disambiguation at all.
Gotcha, and anyway it strikes me that the user can still get the number of address components already by counting the slash characters in the input, which is a trivial subpatch/abstraction. Cheers, Chris. -- http://mccormick.cx/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
