On 09/23/2014 09:19 AM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
I disagree. Your example lists what? 2 more developers? I'm talking
about "developers" as in people working the C code, build scripts,
tcl/tk etc aka people who could, theoretically, help push out a new
Pd-extended release. True, we have plenty of people working on
externals, but this is a problem for someone who can go deeper.
I still maintain that the number of low level developers to overall
users (non-developers) is relatively low.
That's true in nearly any piece of user-facing software. But compared
to other user-facing software, Pd seems to have a fairly large number of
users with a working knowledge of C, building/compiling, etc. Enough
that I can think of at least 13 for whom there is proof just by what
I've read from them on the user list. But there are probably many more
than that.
-Jonathan
On Sep 23, 2014, at 6:00 AM, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
However, your description of the user/developer ratio doesn't ring
true to me. There's actually a surplus of developers and development
energy-- I count two implementations of presets in the last year or
two (in Pd-l2ork and the Chocolate et Coffee lib) which are in
addition to however many already exist on svn and the Pd forum.
--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
