-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-09-30 17:08, Frank Barknecht wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 03:51:38PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig > wrote: >> On 2014-09-30 12:20, Frank Barknecht wrote: >>> I see that there now are the rather peculiar "list fromsymbol" >>> and "list tosymbol" methods in [list], but the much needed >>> "list foreach" still is missing. Why? >> >> most likely, because yo can do a [list foreach] as a simple >> abstraction (if you don't mind another name), while you cannot do >> a [list tosymbol]. > > Okay, I see. But with the same logic, [list length] could be > considered superfluous. > > list-drip.pd, the equivalent abstraction to "list foreach" in the > [list]-abs is the most used abstraction in the whole collection. > Although Matju's implementation is highly optimized, including > "list foreach" as an interal method would speed things up > immensely.
+1 fgmsdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUKtdXAAoJELZQGcR/ejb4z1kP/2SUgEjS2zXb5E53UQGea+XL pfGiU0oX0kdvI+AaRE5FwcIWzoFsHhtI5hr7E6qCqM8u+Y9ihvq2d5xC9XSzujwB PdUdP3qeSz2rz6aTkvCusQ7O4siM5wu4EAIWHS9q6tpaqC95qBaciaedN6cb654O tcs8B3n94sM6/0jVfW2v2BE++mfGhvgxRg0NTF63apZqQSytSdMYf6zzFb9LI65G FmaWFaiKINLbsgWv5vGRa8fEOc8UhP2bczOhCBiMplWcMxpSbEICTL6RfRGXxle7 uGPexTTuMMq04jiOpwpTzxUi0Z2frkE1M7O+ZEG87CQ8Qwg3o9oA1ik7a6Svslzn nMS7BaHVSaln+NWDhb0ebLA40DAhxGR+U0u+XrxV50wgg9YlbzOFDzIfabX6be9v oRjG2xu+P1D6+G0ZVU6aTHidg75XRGlk/kx4wjP+AQmiLMU0s5QRE+me/sTeog87 It10YcbUQiEqNguyMWu9pQd4uqzAzolXCzQRuMZRUdl9sWJMKiuO0m2OkW4NQ62q zTt6G3cMRR9lcF+lfhDTRjXiHskslJl254Vcx6buUuBR1km5qPghYX+q9AcAD30y PiT7gJDhg5LLhTmz0fs5BIzLIiVg2nJWQqT05nHZ2hP3hX+7h2XvxBgejbTx6qUl kpYHt6wjqrOo6iruy5jX =apEC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
