No, I probably can't make a better patch. Also, before my last email might be read the wrong way, what I essentially meant was:
"Oh, you have code already working? Maybe I can look into porting it over into a patch." what I did *not* mean was: "Hey, why didn't you spend your free time doing it already? sheesh." and Thanks Chris, really. I need to donate to your beer fund again. On Oct 10, 2014, at 1:54 AM, Chris McCormick <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/10/14 13:31, Dan Wilcox wrote: >> Also, where is a list foreach in the L2ork sources? I checked x_list.c, >> but it only has a note saying foreach is among the things to "Need to >> think more >> about": https://github.com/pd-l2ork/pd/blob/master/pd/src/x_list.c#L32 >> >> If it's there, I can try making a patch but I don't know where to look ... > > I think Jonathan was saying it's something he would like to do, not that > he had done it yet. No need to make a patch as I have submitted one already. > > Unless you think you can make a better patch than me. Them's fighting words! > > http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/clinteastwoodeyes.gif > > Cheers, > > Chris. > > -- > http://mccormick.cx/ -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
