On 12/23/2014 03:27 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote: > what’s important is to break out the external development from the SVN into > smaller, more maintainable repos
i have to admit i totally fail to see, why having all the source code in a single SVN-root makes things more or less complicated. unlike git, SVN allows you to easily check out a sub-directory and work as if it as a "smaller, more maintainable repo". things would be different if *the* pd-repo were in git (but it currently is not). while i personally prefer git over SVN, i think it should be upstream's decision which VCS (if any) they want to use. i think that any packaging/distribution solution that depends on a certain repository format and/or layout, is inherently broken. fgmards IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
