well, maybe I got excited too soon, not much else shows up in the paper that can be related to the moog code...
Well, I tried making a first draft in a patch of what the code seems to be for me. You can find it attached if someone else cares to collaborate. But it is now getting quite mysterious/weird again. Though it seems is just some 4th order filter, nothing too crazy. cheers 2015-01-14 0:21 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]>: > > Seems mostly to be definitely it! Yeah, thanks! > > Mostly coz the paper mentions zeros at 0.3 - and you can easily see that > in the code ;) this seems to be getting less mysterious to implement, weee > > 2015-01-13 23:52 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]>: > > > This is probably the source for Gunter's Moog VCF >> >> Seems mostly to be definitely it! Yeah, thanks! >> >> 2015-01-13 23:48 GMT-02:00 Chris Clepper <[email protected]>: >> >> This is probably the source for Gunter's Moog VCF: >>> >>> https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~stilti/papers/moogvcf.pdf >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Howdy, so David, kinda getting back from my break, thought I'd have >>>> anohter look at this... >>>> >>>> Seems the extended object is related to the 2004 Huovalainen paper, >>>> but I've failed to fully understand the code of moog.c and really match >>>> them. >>>> >>>> Anyone knows about Gunter's wherabouts these days? He could give us a >>>> hint. And yeah, I also saw some moog filter by Miller, which I should find >>>> back and check as well... >>>> >>>> Here's another cool thing I found on the web. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.acoustics.ed.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/AMT_MSc_FinalProjects/2012__Daly__AMT_MSc_FinalProject_MoogVCF.pdf >>>> >>>> So, by looking at the Huovalainen paper, seems doable to do it with >>>> [fexpr~]. In the end, it's just some 4th order filter, right? >>>> >>>> Have you checked MoogFF in Supercollider? >>>> >>>> cheers >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-01-01 13:20 GMT-02:00 Dan Wilcox <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Yes please! >>>>> >>>>> -------- >>>>> Dan Wilcox >>>>> @danomatika >>>>> danomatika.com >>>>> robotcowboy.com >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 31, 2014, at 4:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to understand pd's [moog~] object one day, and implement it >>>>> with [fexpr~] or something. Maybe I'll do this other one as well. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> [email protected] mailing list >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
moog.pd
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
