> There's an attempt to explain all this in chapter 3 of Technique awesome, I'm on it ;)
2015-03-12 13:13 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu>: > There's an attempt to explain all this in chapter 3 of Techniques.. > > http://msp.ucsd.edu/techniques.htm > > cheers > Miller > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:04:17PM +0200, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres < > por...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > ok, so the metro at 1ms is because I'm using extended. > > > > > > as for the minimum time pd can process and send data, what's the final > > > word on it? > > > > > > something like 1.4013e-45 ms? > > > > > > cause that's a lot more than an audio rate at 44.1khz :) > > > > > 1.4013e-45 is smaller than 0.0226757.... > > > > > > > > I thought there was a limit control rate that was below the audio rate, > > > but curiously it can go over. > > > > > > 1 sample at 44.1khz gives us 0.0226757 ms, and I was able to send bangs > > > at 1e-06 ms, according to [timer] > > > > > > check my patch attached, based on the one that was sent here on the > thread. > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list