Hi all,
Thanks for all the replies. Here are my comments:
On 20/04/15 09:52, Etienne Landon wrote:
I'm not sure you need to smooth the angle, if you have a look at the
hrtf set (http://sound.media.mit.edu/KEMAR.html) it only has 5 degrees
precision in yaw and 10 degrees in elevation. So if I'm not wrong your
smoothing as no effect.
Even if its precision is that low I hear audible clicks when I feed
numbers without smoothing them with line. If I simply connect a number
box to it and I use my mouse to scroll up and down the numbers
relatively fast, I hear very clearly some unwanted artifacts.
On 20/04/15 10:12, Òscar Martínez Carmona wrote:
My experience with earplug was that the external itself does the
interpolation for you and there's no need to use line to avoid clicks.
Feeding it directly with and angle with decimals works just fine. Also
even using this 5 degrees resolutio, due to the interpolation I guess,
it feels really smooth.
Same as above. The interpolation done by the object works well up to a
certain limit, but if you are feeding a lot of values and if the changes
are large enough, the clicks will be heard.
On 20/04/15 10:14, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
unwrap consecutive angles to make sure that the (naïve) difference
(=abs(x1-x0)) between the two angles is always <=180°. (so when going
from 170° to -170°, you unwrap the second value to 190°)
then [line].
(so you get steps: 170..180..190 rather than 170..0..-170)
than wrap the result back to 0°..360° (if that's beeded by [earplug~]).
I think I understand what you propose. I will try to implement this and
see how it goes.
Thank you all for the help, I really appreciate it.
Cheers,
Gilberto
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
