On 2015-04-28 03:52, Simon Wise wrote: > On 28/04/15 00:31, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: >> I though that the Debian Jessie repositories have Pd-0.46-2, or am I >> wrong?
no, you are right: the authorative page shows 0.46.2-1 https://packages.debian.org/jessie/puredata > > but no stable is currently shown > > it may be that debian is in the middle of switching stable to jessie, so > the repositories are being renamed in stages? maybe your update was done > at one of these transition moments? i don't know the reason why "stable" is missing from your list. however: Debian/jessie has been released as stable 2 days ago. so yes, there are some major changes going on right now. otoh, "stable", "testing" and "unstable" are implemented as symlinks to the codenamed repositories: "jessie" has been available for a few years (as "testing"), making it "stable" requires no copying at all and should be handled in the blink of an eye ;-) > > anyway it looks like jessie still has 0.46.2-1 jessie ships with 0.46.2-1, and will always do. around 2014-11-06, jessie entered "frozen", which means that after that no newer package versions could have entered Debian/jessie. miller released pd-0.46-3 around 2014-12-10, so that was definitely too late for inclusion. fgmas IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
