no, but it's obviously more inefficient :) it could be simpler if you were to use [change~], that was the tricky part for me
2015-06-07 12:20 GMT-03:00 Peter P. <[email protected]>: > * Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]> [2015-06-06 17:17]: > > the other day I implemented, just for fun, the [cyclone/slide~] object > with > > [fexpr~], it's 100% compatible to vanilla. find it attached. cheers > Great! Did you have a chance to compare cpu useage between the two? >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
