> On Jun 7, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Jun 7, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> such as why would it have to be concentrated in "one person”?
> 
> Because that’s how the existing extended setup was originally built and 
> maintained.

Also it didn’t have to be that way, but that’s how it ended up. We don’t feel 
it’s sustainable to hope that someone else steps up to take it over and it’s 
not like the pd-extended sources are locked up until someone wants to pick it 
up. They are sitting there ready to be worked on again but no one has. Chris is 
right: code > talk.

It’s frankly a lot of work and it simply makes more sense to find a way to 
distribute alot of that which is the current approach that’s being taken. Split 
up the work so nobody really gets stuck in a bottle neck. Make it easy for 
people to download and install the externals they need with vanilla and for 
developers to respond to bugs etc so the feedback loop is faster and easier.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>


_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to