> the object you describe sounds to me identical to [maxlib/scale] it almost is, but in maxlib you just turn the mapping to log on or off, in max you specify a log parameter.
I did share a patch in text and attached. Not sure if everyone gets the attachment so I sent the text file as well, but here's the attached file to you again, and I'm also sharing a downloadable link https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3AoiT0xk8fnRGphNTlTdFNxQ2c/view?usp=sharing by the way, I'm pretty sure I'm not doing anything wrong, and the given equation in Max just seems to be wrong cheers 2015-06-19 19:53 GMT-03:00 Gilberto Agostinho via Pd-list < [email protected]>: > Hi Alexandre, > > On 20/06/15 00:39, [email protected] wrote: > >> Here's my patch with that formula into expr. The output with the >> parameters >> I have should be -0.997347 - as that's the output I get in Max. But >> instead, it's giving -0.994694... >> > > Would you care to share your parameters so we can test your abstraction? > > Also, I haven't been reading this list very attentively lately (busy days, > you know) so I may have lost quite a lot of discussions lately, but the > object you describe sounds to me identical to [maxlib/scale], which takes 5 > arguments: input low, input high, output low, output high, coefficient > (linear or log). > > Cheers, > Gilberto > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
scale-test.pd
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
