ok, so now I see that snapshot~ may output values in the same rate as vsnapshot~ but it'll only output the last sample of a block, and won't work for block sizes less than 64 in size
so yeah, the idea of a vsnapshot~ seems nice, and seems to work fine, what would the bugs be? cheers 2015-06-28 2:21 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]>: > Ok, and you know what? I've been making tests, and it seems [snapshot~] is > just doing the same job as [vsnapshot~], so I'm not sure if there's a case > it is needed. > > Since you are thinking about getting it to work, let me ask, what would it > be needed for? > > cheers > > 2015-06-28 1:33 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette <[email protected]>: > >> Better not play with it - it's not well designed and I want to put it out >> to >> pasture once I or someone can design a correct one. >> >> cheers >> Miller >> >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:22:03AM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: >> > Could anyone tell me a use they have for [vsnapshot~]? Trying to make a >> > good example to explain its purpose, thanks >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > [email protected] mailing list >> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
